But you're going beyond the 52 weeks. You're looking at the whole period they were on strike, so you're making it quite different from the exemptions that are already in the legislation, such as for illness. So I was asking you why you're making it longer.
I understand what you're saying, because they might be on strike much longer, but then a person may be ill for a much longer period of time, and there's a maximum now. That's why I'm wondering why this one is being treated differently from the other, from your perspective. Why does it need and deserve to be treated differently?