I would certainly echo that, from the perspective of the Canadian Association for Community Living. You have been one of the champions, Judy, and we will miss your voice at the federal and national levels. Well, we'll miss it at the federal level. I'm sure we'll be hearing from you nationally in the years to come.
In terms of thinking about a study, article 33 speaks of four things. First is having a focal point. The explanatory memorandum issued by the Government of Canada said it would be the Office for Disability Issues. That's a possibility. Can the Office for Disability Issues actually manage interdepartmental coordination? I think that should be looked at. Should we go in the direction of Norway, which has established a cabinet-level committee on disability to manage coordination and implementation of the convention? That establishes a much higher profile structure and authoritative structure, which we think is much more up to the task of managing the interdepartmental coordination issues this convention requires. So there is a focal point, coordination, monitoring, and civil society and engagement.
You can look at article 33 and ask what the options are. What do we know internationally about how to do this? What does the community think? What is our experience in this country with other international treaties, such as the Convention on the Rights of the Child, CEDAW, and the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights? What have we learned about implementation and progress on those treaties that we might apply to this convention so that it could have the greatest impact possible? Those are questions we don't have answers to yet, but they are deserving of study.