Thank you for that. I think it's a very fair question, Tony, and I understand what you're trying to achieve by bringing it forward.
The distinction I'm hearing from Mr. Beauséjour is between voluntary and compulsory, and the reason, I believe, that he's making that distinction is that if someone has a newborn child and is not being compelled to go into the theatre, they could claim their benefit. They would have the ability to claim that benefit and to volunteer later on, after the benefit has expired. That would permit them to both perform a duty voluntarily and to take advantage of the benefit that they paid for.
In the case of Mr. Duquette, he could not have made that choice. He was called into duty to carry out a highly specialized task that I suspect very few people in the forces could even do. It's a very highly skilled, technical role that he plays in Kabul. He would not have been able to exercise his discretion and opt to take the benefit immediately and then go later as a volunteer.
I don't want to speak for you, Mr. Beauséjour, but am I capturing the distinction you're trying to make when I say that?