Evidence of meeting #30 for Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Rose-Gabrielle Birba  Senior Counsel, Legal Services, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development
Dominique La Salle  Director General, Seniors and Pensions Policy Secretariat, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development

10:35 a.m.

NDP

Joe Comartin NDP Windsor—Tecumseh, ON

Think about the one we had this week, where the person was incarcerated for 27 years; I think that person actually is over 65.

Would it go all the way back to age 65? Is there any limit on the retroactivity?

10:35 a.m.

Director General, Seniors and Pensions Policy Secretariat, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development

Dominique La Salle

In the case of administrative error or erroneous advice, there's no limit.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Candice Bergen

Thank you.

On clause 4, the NDP amendment has been withdrawn and the Bloc amendment has been withdrawn.

Mr. Komarnicki, you wanted to speak.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

I just wanted to say, Madam Chair, that I think by consent of all parties, we've come upon a suitable amendment to clause 4, and there will be a number of consequential amendments along the same lines that Mr. Comartin had in his amendments.

I'm wondering if we couldn't ask the department officials to read in what the “amendment by consent” would be in English and French, and then we can proceed as we go clause-by-clause, starting with clause 4 now.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Candice Bergen

All right.

So what we'll do, then, is if the officials have, both in English and French, the amendment that was proposed by consent, if you could read that, then we'll open it up for discussion and vote on that amendment and then proceed from there.

Could you please read that?

10:35 a.m.

Senior Counsel, Legal Services, Department of Human Resources and Skills Development

Rose-Gabrielle Birba

The amended clause reads as follows:Despite subsection (1), if the application by a person described in subsection 5(3) is approved while that person is incarcerated, payment of their pension shall commence in respect of the month in which they are released but only after they notify the Minister in writing before or after their release.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Candice Bergen

Thank you.

Do we need to have any discussion on that amendment? All right.

(Amendment agreed to)

(Clause 4 as amended agreed to)

(On clause 5)

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Candice Bergen

What we're going to have to do now, though, is look at each one of the clauses and see the exact wording. I think this probably will take longer than just five minutes, because there are several potential amendments that I think will need to be addressed.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

Maurice Vellacott Conservative Saskatoon—Wanuskewin, SK

Is that consequential to the--

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Candice Bergen

It is, but there's very specific wording, so unless the clerk--

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

Can we proceed until we are done?

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Candice Bergen

For sure, yes.

Monsieur Lessard.

10:40 a.m.

Bloc

Yves Lessard Bloc Chambly—Borduas, QC

Madam Chair, there will be issues of consistency resulting from the amendment that we just passed. What we just decided will automatically have an impact on other clauses. Maybe at our next meeting we could be told where those consequential changes need to be made.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Candice Bergen

Yes, if the committee would be in agreement, I think that would probably be a very wise thing to do, so that everyone has the opportunity to see in writing exactly how the amendments look in both official languages.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

Madam Chair, the amendments are exactly the same in five different places. It's the same wording, so it's not like it's that complicated.

We might want to just plough through. It is saying the same thing: before or after.

10:40 a.m.

An hon. member

Yes, let's just keep going.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Candice Bergen

Okay, let's do that.

So then we need someone to move the amendment on clause 5.

Mr. Comartin.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

It's by consent--

10:40 a.m.

NDP

Joe Comartin NDP Windsor—Tecumseh, ON

Mr. Lessard has that amendment. I'm not clear that....

This is his amendment, not a subamendment. His amendment is still outstanding. It is on clause 4, and I believe it's still outstanding.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Candice Bergen

He didn't move it.

10:40 a.m.

NDP

Joe Comartin NDP Windsor—Tecumseh, ON

He did not move it? Okay. Thank you.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Candice Bergen

So we are back to clause 5, and we need someone to move--

10:40 a.m.

An hon. member

It's by consent.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Candice Bergen

By consent?

10:40 a.m.

Some hon. members

Yes.