I do think they're very important questions. I think every question on both the short-form census and the long-form census can be objectively assessed for the value the data will bring to society. It should go through that scrutiny. If a question doesn't meet the test of value, then it shouldn't be included. The fact that these questions can be revised, altered, dropped, and that new questions can be added...all that process has already been in place.
To further respond to Mr. Vellacott on the subject of fines, I agree that's not really where the focus should be. This was not an issue for as long as Canada has been doing the census. It was not an issue until it was made an issue.
There's been a very good record of participation and confidence in the data that's resulted from those who have participated in a mandatory framework, with apparently zero levying of any penalties at all.
If Canadians understand the context in which the questions are being asked and how it can relate to their lives, I think the participation rate will be very strong, even with the prospect of a penalty hanging over their heads. It doesn't seem to me, based on the participation we're getting, that this is what's driving people. I think most people are replying out of a sense of duty.