Thank you, Madam Chair.
This motion, verbatim, virtually, is what was passed in the House by all parties with unanimous consent in the name of Mr. Jeff Watson before we prorogued. So the motion doesn't get renewed, as with the bill itself. That's a different little wrinkle in respect to motions. So basically all I'm doing is putting the same wording forward in terms of the study that had been agreed to by all parties in coming to this committee prior to the prorogation. I would think, hopefully, that it's pretty straightforward.
Yes, we did add the words “be instructed to examine”, so there is a difference, whereas the motion itself that was passed unanimously in the House would not have had the words “be instructed to”. That's the nature of the motion that passed in the House.