I can say briefly that you're correct with respect to the New Brunswick plan. It does allow it if it's part of a bona fide pension plan. That, in fact, was the subject of a Supreme Court decision last year when it debated what a bona fide pension plan meant. Did it have to be justified from the standpoint of safety and so on? The court found that it didn't and that it was really looking at the sincerity of the pension plan.
Those are types of measures.... In fact, in the Federal Court's recent decision, last week, the Federal Court judge found that making changes to benefits and making changes to insurance plans was a less intrusive way than blanket mandatory retirement to address some of those concerns about the complex social and economic matter of having deferred compensation and so on. That was specifically addressed.