I think you raise a very interesting point. We are talking about availability for work, but what this legislation is doing is removing an exemption, under which the clock would stop ticking on that period of availability until the person was available for work, until he would no longer be behind bars. You have a certain logic there, but you are disentitling a group that now has a benefit under the legislation—they stop the clock from running when they're behind bars.
Now, they didn't choose to stop work. They may have chosen to do an act that led them to be--