Just really quickly, it seems to me that when we hear people talking choice.... What we know is that there are some Canadians who are not eligible for an extension of either the benefit period or qualifying period because of the way the current rules are. It seems the approach has been that we've got this other population that is eligible for the extension of the qualifying period or the benefit period because of the current legislation. But the response is that rather than improving the legislation for those who currently don't have access, let's take something away for somebody who does have access.
Do you have some comment about this? You clearly articulated why it's an advantage to continue to allow that extension of either the benefit or the qualifying period for people who are incarcerated. There is a cost to society if you don't allow that extension. Is that correct?