Just to absolutely clarify the record, I was not equating somebody who had been injured on the job with somebody in the courts. I was simply pointing out the fact that under the legislation, both parties are entitled to an extension. I'm not equating anybody with anybody. That's what the legislation says. It's in there, black and white, passed by Parliament. So don't try to pin that kind of language on me, because it's simply not true.
The second item is that I also thank the parliamentary secretary for pointing out that this is an insurance scheme, and that's exactly why we're opposing this particular piece of legislation. We are talking about people who have paid their premiums. The workers and their employers have paid their premiums, so what they're actually going to be entitled to, if this legislation were defeated, is continuing to collect benefits for which they have paid into under the insurance scheme. That's all I have to say.