Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'm a visitor here today, but I'm astonished at a couple of things. I know we have people called career counsellors in the high schools, who try to do a good job, despite the fact that they have no real information to be able to tell students where the jobs will be in the future to help them make choices. I know that for a fact. I know it's a provincial jurisdiction, but I would strongly suggest that we might have some cooperation between HRSDC people and the provincial people who would deal with that.
I'm also a little astonished that there seems to be some consideration that the data that identify potential job areas seem to be unreliable—I think that was the word. With the technology we have today, we have companies that have the skill to do what they call either dynamic modelling or situation modelling, using the most sophisticated database technology. They put in all the data and it chews it all up and spits out the most accurate information you could imagine. They can predict pretty much anything.
I'm surprised there isn't a company like this that is working with the government or on contract with the government to provide accurate information, because it's such a vital part of our economy going forward. I'm really surprised, because I know that technology exists. I know there are companies that do this for a wide variety of areas and provide that information to our government: When are we going to run out of fish? How about the caribou? How much corn do we need? They can figure this all out, and they can apply that same technology to identify where the skill shortages are going to be and how this is going to play out with the demographics going down the road.
To your knowledge, is there any consideration being given to try to get that more refined so that we can get accurate information?