That level of sophistication of the industry is kind of a double-edged sword.
Once people understand that we are quite sophisticated and technologically advanced, it adds a cool factor. There is a lot of very advanced technology. There are things like remote mining, in which you have equipment operated from the surface or at a great distance so that you're far removed from the risk. There are very advanced geo-scientific techniques. We have a lot of PhDs and master's grads working in the mining sector.
That's appealing, but it also poses a challenge, because there is not necessarily a surplus of those people around, particularly those with mining expertise.
In the past it was easy to tap into the general labour pool and provide a minimum amount of training. It was more a brawny sort of endeavour.
It is working in our favour when we can get the word out. It also means that in the post-secondary system, mining-related programs and programs for mining engineering tend to be among the most expensive to operate. The faculties are not huge. They're expensive to run. They're expensive to scale up. So there are challenges there.
There are also opportunities in terms of transitioning workers from other sectors. Other sectors have also evolved technologically, and people from them would be sort of 75% or 80% of the way there and would require only some top-up training. The mining industry has had some success in reaching out to laid-off forestry workers and topping off their skills and getting them to work. That's a great example, because they tend to be located in the same areas.
Getting back to the mobility challenge, even in areas that are economically depressed and that have high unemployment, if they are larger urban centres that are better served, we find it very challenging to get people to agree to relocate to a more remote community, even with the promise of employment and training.