There are a couple of aspects, as I understand it, to explain how it exists.
First of all, none of us is afraid of good competition, fair Canadian competition in which airlines compete against each other in a competitive environment. We'd like all the airlines to have the same competitive advantage. That goes whether our flight and duty time regulations are different or whether there is one safety standard in this country.
The same goes with respect to training. We've learned how the LMO can be used in some cases, as Dan has said, to help identify a shortage of workers, if it is written properly. What is in our industry a given, absolutely normal cost of doing business is the training of a pilot to fly a particular type of airplane. That training cost is anywhere from $25,000 to $40,000. WestJet does it; we do it; Air Transat does it. Anybody who runs an operational business with airplanes has to train their pilots to fly their particular type of airplane.
The way the LMO has been written to rationalize a shortage of pilots is to say that there are no pilots available who are trained with the type rating to go right in and fly those airplanes. If WestJet laid off all of their pilots, under that LMO, none of them would be qualified to fly at Air Canada. It just doesn't make sense to me, but that's the way I think it is rationalized.