More than 50% of the CASDO board is made up of with disabilities, so they're the face and the voice of making some of these decisions. If we're looking at the continuum, when a person with disabilities is applying for something, I think it's pretty clear that those people would not have to be charged. At the other end of it, if it's Canadian Tire or some big international corporation asking for a whole bunch of things, there is that level of discretion.
I think there is a long continuum there. Some judgments have to be made with respect to that. I think in those instances, the principle of those people in need.... Am I interpreting this correctly in terms of the range?