It's a complex question. We can certainly produce a range of indicators of precarious employment. We do already have a range that we can expand on. There's a separate question. I think people may be looking for one silver bullet, a single-measure indication of precarity, and I would recommend that people think more in terms of a basket of measures, a range of measures that touch on different aspects of precarity, such as pension coverage, wages, hours, permanence of employment. That's the range of indications we currently have, and we're committed to expanding it.
I honestly don't see a way of coming up with a single measure that would quantify precisely the number of people in a precarious position.