Sure. I think, as with most debates, it comes down to a question of whether government policy can drive it or whether it's.... A lot of our advocacy is focused on leaving money in the pockets of Canadians and letting other forces do the job. Now, some people say that's sort of doing nothing. I think one thing that's important for government to remember, and it's been highlighted by this debate over CPP, is that it can be a blunt instrument, and you can have very unfortunate unintended consequences. If you are targeting help at a group that everyone agrees needs help, for example low-income seniors, asking a question about whether CPP is the right vehicle to do that doesn't mean we don't care about low-income seniors; it just means maybe there is a better mechanism to deal with it.
For example, when Mr. Brain talks about GIS, I think that is a good example of something that would be better suited to the objective here, which is to help seniors who are at risk of poverty or in poverty.