Evidence of meeting #98 for Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Barbara Moran  Director General, Strategic Policy, Analysis and Workplace, Labour Program, Department of Employment and Social Development
Brenda Baxter  Director General, Workplace Directorate, Labour Program, Department of Employment and Social Development
Olivier Champagne  Legislative Clerk
John Nater  Perth—Wellington, CPC
Charles Bernard  Director General, Portfolio and Government Affairs, Department of Public Works and Government Services

6:30 p.m.

Conservative

Steven Blaney Conservative Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis, QC

Yes, Mr. Chair, I would remove the first proposed subsection in my amendment and I would ask for your advice through the clerk on the second, that “The report stands referred to the committee of the Senate, of the House of Commons or of both Houses of Parliament that is designated or established to review matters related to occupational health and safety.”

I believe that would still be a good element to have in the bill to make sure that for a committee like ours in the near future, not only the House, it would be up to the committee to decide whether they go through it or not, but at least the report would be referred to them.

I would like any advice from the clerk.

6:30 p.m.

Legislative Clerk

Olivier Champagne

Your amendment mentions an independent review, which is not the case for amendment LIB-16. There would be an overlap or redundancy if amendment CPC-8 were passed, but the review would probably be different, given that it's independent.

It is up to you to decide how you want to present your amendment. You can introduce it with changes, but the wording must be clear.

From a procedural point of view, I told the chair that the amendment could be accepted as is.

6:30 p.m.

Conservative

Steven Blaney Conservative Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis, QC

Unlike what I'm proposing, Mr. Ruimy's amendment suggests that the act be reviewed by the minister.

I would like to withdraw the first part of my amendment and only keep the second part. Actually, based on what you are telling me, I must withdraw it fully in this case, because of the report on the independent review.

6:30 p.m.

Legislative Clerk

Olivier Champagne

Yes, the second part could not stand on its own.

6:30 p.m.

Conservative

Steven Blaney Conservative Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis, QC

So I'll drop my amendment.

6:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Bryan May

Amendment CPC-8 is withdrawn.

Now we're into the fun stuff.

Shall the title carry?

6:30 p.m.

Some hon. Members

Agreed.

6:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Bryan May

Shall the bill, as amended, carry?

6:30 p.m.

Some hon. Members

Agreed.

6:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Bryan May

Shall I report the bill, as amended, to the House?

6:30 p.m.

Some hon. Members

Agreed.

6:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Bryan May

Shall the committee order a reprint of the bill, as amended?

6:30 p.m.

Some hon. Members

Agreed.

6:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Bryan May

That's all she wrote.

Before we adjourn, I would just like to thank everybody involved in this piece of legislation. This has not been an easy piece of legislation to deal with. Thanks go specifically to those who helped us along the way. The government officials and the folks to my left and right essentially had to create systems to do what we wanted to do in order to study this properly, and so I think they deserve our thanks for that.

6:30 p.m.

Some hon. Members

Hear, hear!

6:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Bryan May

I'm very pleased that we've been able to strengthen this bill, and I'm looking forward to seeing it proceed to the Senate.

Thank you very much, everybody.

The meeting is adjourned.