Very good.
Do we have consensus for this amendment to the motion to accept the subcommittee report? I believe I see consensus in the room.
(Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Do we have consensus with respect to the motion for the adoption of the subcommittee report as amended? I see consensus on that.
(Motion as amended agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])
The second item I would like to raise is with respect to that first study called for in the report, the indigenous housing study. I believe it says so in the report, but if not, we would ask that witness lists be provided to the clerk by this Friday. You probably have witness lists that were submitted in the last Parliament, so if they could be updated and submitted by Friday, that will allow us to be productive early.
The analysts can also provide a suggested witness list if that is the will of the group. They are also in a position to provide a draft work plan, organize witnesses thematically and deal with any other suggestions that the committee has. The suggestion we have from analysts is that we would start with departmental officials from ESDC, Canada Mortgage and Housing, Crown-Indigenous Relations, and Indigenous Services.
It would be normal for us to allow for the submission of written briefs. Perhaps we could have a discussion around a deadline for those briefs. The standard deadline is by the last meeting of the study, and the limit is typically 1,500 to 2,000 words. The Parliamentary Budget Officer has offered to submit a document outlining the scope of their analysis for our consideration.
It appears that with the technical limitations and the fact that we're going to be inviting ministers on main estimates, tabling before the Christmas break isn't feasible or likely. I guess that's to manage your expectations or to pass along to you the advice that I've been given.
With that by way of setting the—