I'm sorry to interrupt you again. I don't like doing it.
I am familiar with the multitude of programs that are offered and what their objectives are. We sometimes make announcements in our ridings about money that will be spent on a particular program. In some cases, we get the impression that it is recycled money, the same money going around and around.
My question is simple. You can answer yes or no. Do you think some programs should be tightened up?
Should some programs be defined better or should how the money is being spent be reviewed?
Do you think the various programs will meet the objective established in the housing affordability strategy? If not, should we be doing things differently?