The amendment has been passed and you're not rescinding it. Again, I express my concern about misusing procedure.
When we go back to the original motion to vote on it, I'll be confused. Based on the amendment, I don't know how we.... I guess we can still do it; it's just because there's no timeline in the original motion. If we pass the original motion, the minister would still be forthcoming, if I understand that correctly.
If not, I'd like some clarity on that procedurally as we debate this and vote on the main motion. I'm more than willing to move the subamendment that Madame Chabot has proposed to the committee.