All of us certainly acknowledge that we're in a pandemic. There have been a lot of challenges through that, but when we did this report in 2016, it was an extensive report. We studied every sector.
I come from an aquaculture background. I'm on the east coast. I worked for a company called Stolt Sea Farm. It doesn't exist anymore, but it was an international salmon company here on the east coast.
I know the aquaculture industry certainly has challenges with temporary foreign workers. I was thrilled to do the study. Again, I want to tell the committee that the study was extremely extensive. We talked to every sector and had a lot of input, a lot of good testimony and a lot of very interesting witnesses. Again, I go back to the two companies in southern Manitoba—Maple Leaf Foods and HyLife—and pork producers and the challenges they faced with respect to temporary foreign workers. It was fascinating that without the support of temporary foreign workers they would literally leave $1.2 billion of unsold product on the table.
Again, I'm asking the committee to read that report. Take my free advice, which is that what you want to get at and what you're looking for are already there. There's absolutely no need to do it again.
At times we get caught up on doing a report. We feel good about the report and then it's shelved. A few years later we want to do the report again. On this one, there's just no need to do it. That's my opinion. It was a very extensive report.
I ask all committee members to take the time and get that report. There are a lot of other important issues, Chair, that we can bring forward as a committee that would be a lot more important and will have an impact on so many Canadians from coast to coast to coast.
Mr. Chair, again, I want to reiterate that I was part of that study. It was extensive. It was a very good report. I ask all committee members to get it.
I can't support this, because it's duplication. We have a lot more that we could do.