Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you for being here today, to those from Air Canada who did eventually respond to the call initiated by our colleague Ms. Zarrillo, which was supported unanimously by this committee.
Sir, I've noticed, and it's no surprise.... Anybody who's a member of Parliament develops relationships with their constituents. Very profound relationships are those that exist with members of communities that advocate on behalf of those who are disabled.
In my community in London, Ontario, Jeff Preston is a professor of disability studies at the university. He and I have known each other for a number of years. I did reach out to him in advance of the meeting today to ask what he would want to come out of this meeting and if he wanted to say anything to you through my questions.
In December, Jeff travelled. His wheelchair was broken. He was in touch with Air Canada well before the flight to make sure that there would be an understanding at the arrival airport that there was a wheelchair on board, to make sure everything was smooth. Clearly, it was not.
His question, though, is not to delve too much into the unfortunate incident—which, by the way, took away from his Christmas because he had to resolve the matter with customer service instead of enjoying Christmas with his family. He wanted me to ask the following question:
A big part of the problem here isn't that Air Canada is missing important policies or procedures. It seems to be that none of these policies or procedures are being adequately downstreamed from corporate legal to the front line. How do you plan on actually fixing this problem, when obviously your current approach or methodology of training and communicating that through your system is an abject failure?
That's a direct quote from my constituent, Jeff Preston. What do you have to say to Mr. Preston?
By the way, I think his story is not unique.
I will end the question with this. I do notice, sir, that in your testimony you talked about the policies and procedures in place and how seriously you take all of this. I take you at your word on that. I'm not going to question that. However, it's clearly not finding effect. What is your plan for a substantive change going forward?