Thank you for the question. I'll do my best to answer, as I may need to become somewhat more familiar with the bills that you're referring to. However, I think that, in general, I can answer your question.
Government intervention, in general, is what we're talking about. Section 107 is one way that the government can intervene in collective bargaining. Putting the question before Parliament can be different in that it's not a unilateral action. It's not the action of one person at one time. In a sense, it's the people of Canada speaking. I think for members, while it may be distasteful, it's understood somewhat differently than one person, one minister, acting.
Is that a fair answer to your question? Does that answer your question?