If part III of the code is going to be examined and amended, it needs to be done in a comprehensive way that avoids the piecemeal, one-off changes to specific terms that create unpredictability for employers and impact employers differently depending on which industry they are in.
Any reform to the definitions in part III of the code calls for a comprehensive review that has both employer representatives and worker representatives at the table to figure out what's working and what's not. Through that review, hopefully, any definitions, whether related to work or any other minimum standards that are unclear or not doing the job they need to do in the 21st-century economy, could be reviewed and jointly agreed-upon changes could be made.