Is the question clear? I'm not sure who should be responding, but do you understand the question I'm asking?
Would this require new paperwork? Would it require application forms to be filled out on the part of the parents in these cases? Is it possible that claims can be denied? Is it an approval process?
I think what all of these parents are looking for in this situation is the ability to have the bereavement leave continue and to not need to deal with bureaucracy with forms and the paperwork. You can appreciate that when they've just lost a child.... This is something that many witnesses told us during this study and during the previous study on M-110 years ago. One of the biggest things was the idea that they had to go and deal with all of this stuff when they're trying to grieve and they haven't had a chance to even bury their child.
The question is, does this create a need...? Whether it's in the clause itself or the amendment that was not moved, would it require paperwork? Would it require those forms? Would it be an application process, where the claim could actually potentially be denied?
Are those things that someone could answer for us?