Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I think it's probably important. I would assume that we have some families following along at home. We have a number of amendments that were put forward in a package and haven't been moved, but could potentially be moved at some later point in time. What we're trying to figure out is.... They're very technical and we're trying to make sure that whatever changes could potentially be made—not necessarily just the ones that are going to be made—are going to actually serve the families we are setting out to serve. Mr. Beech has worked on the legacy that was built and started by Mr. Richards. This is about making sure that these families are brought to the least bad place that they can possibly be. This is very commendable work.
The amendments that were brought forward, that we got at the very last minute, are exceptionally technical and exceptionally complex. They are longer than the legislation itself. I do think it is incumbent on us.... We're not trying to slow this down in any capacity. Having an explanation as to what each of these amendments is trying to set out should not be difficult, but it is difficult. We're wondering if we could have a bit of an explanation as to what these amendments are seeking to try to fix, just so we have a better understanding of how this is going to help make this bill better.
I think everyone paying attention would benefit from this, and all parliamentarians, as they're making their decisions, would benefit.
If that could be done, if Mr. Beech, perhaps, is the person who could explain it, or if one of the analysts could explain what each proposed change in each of these proposed amendments that were not moved meant, that would be really helpful for me, at the very minimum.