I think it's such an important question.
Although I know that across the aisle we hear a lot of mocking whenever we speak about EI, if you've ever lost your job, as I have, you'll know that EI is actually a very important component of recovery when a person experiences job loss, so we've done a couple of things.
We've increased something called the LMDAs, which are transfers to provinces and territories that are closest to the ground. We've worked in partnership with the provinces and territories to make sure that if a person's job is threatened, they are immediately supported with wraparound supports, with access to employment insurance and, broader than that, with the opportunity to retrain and the opportunity to get support for updating their résumé and updating their ability to do a job search.
We've also extended EI for long-tenured workers. The older you are and the longer you've been in a place, the harder it can be to find a job, so we've extended EI for long-tenured workers.
We've made it easier for people to get EI. We've waived the one-week waiting period, and we've allowed people to keep monies on separation, which means anything that's coming to you for vacation, sick time or other kinds of benefits is not held back from your EI. This is to make sure people aren't feeling the financial crisis immediately.
Finally, we've offered work sharing to workplaces that believe that even though they're facing a downturn, they see a light at the end of the tunnel, have new customers or are pivoting to a new approach. We've allowed companies to train workers and keep them on EI and a partial salary to retain them in that workforce.
What employers will say is that if they have to close their doors completely and then resume business, it can be very difficult to get those workers back. The real focus is trying to keep everybody attached to the workforce first, but if they're threatened, then it's about making sure they have the support financially and practically to find their next job.