From my perspective, the best way to answer your question is with an example.
Look at what the federal government is trying to do in terms of labour market attachment and what you're trying to do from a business development perspective. I happen to know this, and I know you know this as well. We've had these conversations around a growing number of social enterprises built and designed to support people's needs. When they have that and we actually have a pathway to a viable social enterprise, they not only create tremendous value in labour market attachment, business development and value for communities; they also go a long way to providing people who also need affordable housing with a pathway to a brighter future.
Is that not an opportunity to coinvest, based on a combined set of principles and goals that both of those parts of the federal government are trying to achieve? You can take that and break it out to any combination of departments, such as health, justice, employment and education. All of those investments are being made by the federal government now.
How do you jointly target a group of people who at the same time need housing stability for the experiences?