Mr. Chair and members of the committee, thank you for giving me the opportunity to participate in this study on food inflation and the national school food program.
My name is Valérie Marin, and I am the executive director of the Centre d'action bénévole Marguerite-Dubois in Bromont, which is located in the Brome‑Missisquoi RCM in Quebec. I am a trained social worker, and I recently completed a master's degree in food security at Laval University.
Today, I mainly want to share with you what we are seeing every day on the ground.
Requests for food assistance have been on the rise in our community for several years now. That is a serious concern, but what also worries me is the change in the profile of the people who are seeking our services. We are now helping two-parent families in which both parents work but whose incomes are no longer sufficient to cover all of their basic needs. We are also seeing an increase in demand from older people, particularly for food services that help them remain in their own homes.
Rising food prices are putting a lot of pressure on household budgets. Families have to choose between food, housing, heating and transportation. In a rural area like Brome‑Missisquoi, long distances and transportation costs exacerbate these difficulties.
Today, having a job no longer necessarily guarantees a family's food security. As a community organization, we respond to those needs through food assistance, community meals, meals on wheels and various support services.
Despite our best efforts, we cannot offset the effects of the rising cost of living on our own. When families with two working parents have to ask for food assistance, it makes us think about the role that schools can play in ensuring access to nutritious food.
I am not an expert on the national school food program, and I cannot claim to know how well it is working. However, based on my experience, I can say that it does help to meet needs. Such a program provides additional support for families, as long as it is sustainable, accessible, free from stigma and tailored to the local context, particularly the supply and transportation-related challenges faced by rural areas.
That brings me to another important point. While some people are struggling to put food on the table, we are continuing to waste large quantities of perfectly good food.
In Brome‑Missisquoi, we have worked with our partners to develop a collective approach to recover, process and redistribute unsold food. I compiled data on this initiative as part of my master's thesis. During the period under review, in 2025, nearly 80,000 kilograms of food were recovered and over 14,000 meals were prepared and redistributed.
We learned through this experience that it is possible to improve the use of available food resources to meet real needs, but it also taught us another valuable lesson: Food that is being given away for free is not always accessible food. It takes equipment, staff, infrastructure and effective coordination to collect, transport, store, process and redistribute that food. Volunteer work is an extraordinary asset, but it cannot replace stable and predictable funding.
Based on these findings, I would like to make three recommendations to the committee.
First, we need to strengthen measures that promote affordable access to healthy food, particularly for working families and seniors with limited incomes. Food assistance cannot be the only response to the rising cost of living. We also need to do something about the conditions that prevent households from meeting their basic needs.
Second, we need to ensure the sustainability of food programs, particularly in schools, while taking into account the actual program costs and the specific circumstances of rural communities. These programs must be able to operate long term without constantly relying on ad hoc funding. The implementation of these programs must also take into account the local context and the resources that are already available in the communities.
Third, I recommend that the federal government look into all of the ways that it could provide sustainable support for initiatives that recover and process food surpluses, whether legislative, regulatory or financial. For example, it could consider passing legislation aimed at reducing food waste.
In Brome‑Missisquoi, we have demonstrated that it is possible to implement practical solutions. However, the development and sustainability of those solutions still too often depends on ad hoc funding and the ability of organizations to mobilize their resources, even though these initiatives help to reduce food waste, use existing resources and contribute to the food security of our communities. It would therefore be useful to better recognize their contribution and support the infrastructure, equipment and human resources necessary to run them.
I would like to close by reminding the committee that solutions already exist in our communities. We have shown that it is possible to implement practical, collective initiatives to improve food security. However, in order for these initiatives to really contribute to sustainable change, they must be recognized and supported in a way that is befitting of their contribution.
I hope that the recommendations made today will be given serious consideration and, more importantly, result in real action.
Thank you, everyone.