It's a great question.
First of all, I'm an extremely passionate Canadian. That's why I'm here today. We invest and create our own apprenticeship programs and training programs. We take youth. We take people with little experience, and we develop them internally. We identify whether or not they have skill sets. We have promotion with internal policy. There are a lot of good things that can happen, but they take money, and they require the company to be in a really healthy position.
I want to disagree with a couple of points, and they might not be as poignant as I heard them, but the government shouldn't be involved in creating jobs. The private sector needs to be creating jobs. The government is not efficient or effective. The private sector is the reason we've been talking so passionately about this topic today. It's the private sector that needs to be creating jobs, creating the innovation, creating the technology and, in our case, manufacturing.
The ratio is 7:1. For every job we create, we influence seven other jobs. We create another seven jobs for every person we hire. When we build a product, there's someone making the skids, someone making the boxes, and someone making the screws and the fasteners. That's why manufacturing is so critical to China and to every economy in the world that wants to succeed. Manufacturing is a very important aspect of it.
To your point, how do we create jobs? We allow companies—not the government creating a new administration centre—to create an environment to be rewarded, to grow and to succeed through lower taxes, lower input costs and a long-term strategy for development.
With the trades, construction is—