Again, we have to go back to the era of the acts. The Citizenship Act has far more meat in it than IRPA. IRPA, when it was created, was very much a framework act. If we take the case of adoptions, that's a classic example. Adoption or adoptees are not mentioned at all in IRPA. I don't think you'll find any provision in the act itself that makes a reference to adoption or adoptees, whereas, with Bill C-14, a lot of the rules will actually be placed in the act.
When IRPA was created in 2001-02, the feeling was that it was appropriate at that time for the committee to have an extra mechanism to review those regulations because the bill itself was a framework bill. That's not really the case with the Citizenship Act--as I say, adoption being one of the best examples.