It seems to me that under the act one can apply for judicial review. It wouldn't take a whole lot, in terms of a decision to turn someone down. I think we're in agreement on that. If that's the case, instead of judicial review you could say that the Federal Court could have appeal. That doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense when you have the appeal division of the Immigration and Refugee Board, which has more expertise in this matter.
I really don't see what the problem is. Just as you have judicial review that people can apply for, why couldn't we direct them to the appeal division to appeal a decision? That would make it consistent with the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. I think that's what legal counsel was presenting--try to make them consistent where possible.