I would like to back up a little.
Ms. Corriveau said there was no difference between the decisions made by men and those made by women. I am not in complete agreement on that. I think that even two men would not make the same decision. People are never 100% objective and impartial. We interpret the act, in my opinion. The act is there to be interpreted. So the decision always depends on the individual making it.
Mr. Jobin said that when a case was closed, it was closed. How can we say that? We are not talking about a hospital; we are not talking about numbers. A board member may make a mistake. And yet his or her decision is final.
New rules have been in place for a while now. Formerly, there were two board members, and the benefit of the doubt must have played a role in the decisions that were handed down. Now you hear the cases alone: you have a huge responsibility.
Are you getting more comprehensive, longer training programs? How can you say that there are no errors? We are talking about human beings, not animals. I feel a little uncomfortable about all this.