Fair enough.
Part of the consideration you're looking at is the refugee application process, but one of the objectives or the policy behind the safe third agreement is to prevent what's commonly referred to as asylum shopping, or cases where I suppose asylum seekers pass up earlier opportunities to obtain refugee protection in order to claim refugee protection in a country of their choice, often for reasons unrelated to a need for protection against removal to countries where they face risk.
Now what's your understanding of asylum shopping? Do you think the agreement does address this? Is there an issue with respect to seeking protection in places other than in the country you first are able to make the application?