Let me say that the duplication is not solved by this agreement. Originally, 10 years ago, when the discussion started, it was to avoid duplication and to ban anyone who made a claim in the United States from coming to Canada and then making another claim here. But the agreement doesn't talk in any way about that. I'm not suggesting that you include it, but I am saying that asylum shopping as a very simplistic way of avoiding making a claim in two countries is not addressed by the agreement. Anyway, this agreement stopped the duplication of things.
The second thing is I think Canadian civil society made a mistake in 2004 because we didn't challenge judicially the safe third country agreement at that time. I think the situation at that particular moment with the United States was very different and was already changing because of the situation with September 11 and all that stuff. We didn't do it for different reasons—lack of resources, lack of vision.
Now it's even clearer than what we knew at that particular moment. You read all our documents opposing the safe third country agreements. They're clear. Now it's even clearer that the differences are abysmal and the situation is not possible to reconcile.