Given that thinking, would you agree with me then that the Federal Court, which has reviews--and I must disagree with you somewhat; it's not just for manifest error of facts, but if they disagree with the facts, they can send the case back for another review. If you were going to have the two levels of appeal, would you agree that you should narrow the areas of appeal to the Federal Court, which would now be a third level of appeal on issues covered in the first two levels?
On February 13th, 2007. See this statement in context.