We definitely need changes—serious changes. Whether they come in a whole new act—I've watched this process and I've been involved in this work for 30 years, if I may say so. I know that different governments have tried to bring in whole acts and they get bogged down. With a minority government, they tend not to get through the whole process before the time is up. As long as the key changes that were made, that have been addressed here, which could be done—There could be a set of amendments that would accommodate all of these changes but would not require a whole new act. I think if that were the focus, then there could be full agreement, and the thing could move ahead much more quickly.
I don't want to say there shouldn't be a new act. There are enough things that call for a new act. I expect that if there is a majority government, and the courts have finished their deliberations on these things, then there probably will be one. Realistically speaking, I would rather move ahead with some of these more modest changes and get them through. I think there would be agreement on many of these things.