In fairness, I think the committee needs to discuss this. Take a word like “deemed”. Maybe somebody doesn't want their citizenship. You don't want to deem it to somebody who doesn't want it. And in fairness, some refining could probably take place in this amendment before granting it. The wording has to be right.
There's one thing I do want to mention with regard to Ms. Finley appearing here a couple of weeks ago. They testified on the lost provisions of ages 24 and 28, that they had advertised and really done a lot to inform people. As it turns out, I think they sent a letter to the committee saying, no, I guess this did not take place.
When judges make decisions they go back into the committee Hansard and read the record of what the committee was talking about, so it would be nice if somebody from that department came back here and corrected it on the record that they in fact did not do due diligence to notify people of the lost provisions.