I would comment briefly that there are two paths to ensure that the legislation is charter-complaint. The first is a path of litigation--that is, forcing individuals to take the time and expense of bringing the judiciary to a point at which they will either strike down unconstitutional laws or read in more constitutional provisions. That's expensive and time-consuming, and it puts the burden on the individual in a way that's unbelievably unfair and costly to that individual.
The second path that can be taken is that the legislature and its committees can take responsibility for ensuring charter compliance; that, in our view, is the more appropriate path to take.