All right.
A number of persons have come to testify before the committee over the past few weeks. It seems that a number of them did not have the necessary information or had an incorrect interpretation of their status in Canada. I don't know whether you can give us your assessment of the quality of the information that was available? In our first meeting with departmental officials, we asked some questions on the quality of information, on the department's efforts to publish the information. We were told that there had been advertising campaigns and all that. In short, we subsequently received a letter telling us the contrary, in which apologies were made for misleading the committee.
Based on your experience, what is your assessment of the information that existed at that time? How is it that a person can find himself in such an unfair situation?