In fact, I'm going to take the same line as Andrew as regards this notice of motion. We are going to support it as well for similar reasons. The question asked was clear, that is whether an advertising campaign had been conducted. The answer was yes. So if we hadn't requested a more detailed report—I'm speculating here—perhaps we wouldn't have received this reply from the department. Perhaps we wouldn't have received these excuses. After hearing from witnesses who had to defend themselves with respect to the Citizenship Act, I believe we owe them an answer, and this would be an opportunity for the department to come and address this question.
On March 26th, 2007. See this statement in context.