My other point is on the testing. When I look at the Harrison report, I see that he said that the new test you talk about seemed to represent a reasonable yardstick for screening candidates against declared member competencies. Would you agree that at the end of the day we want to find somebody who meets at least a certain standard so that, regardless of who you select, they're able to perform the job as you define it?
On April 24th, 2007. See this statement in context.