Yes, a couple of years. It had not obviously been improved even in the previous government.
Why would there be this kind of dichotomy, where some of the new countries have been approved and yet some of the ones that would seem to me not to be a problem haven't been approved? Can you give us your impression?
You mentioned the issue of high risk as being one of those criteria. But if the security of their documentation is in fact as significant as you suggest, then over the previous years, and maybe even now, what do you think the holdback was for the department in allowing that to go ahead?