The concern here is not just with the board or the pre-removal risk assessment; it's also what happens afterwards. For instance, there was the case where somebody was removed who the Falun Dafa Association had identified. The board said it was not credible and didn't believe she was a Falun Gong. The pre-removal risk assessment said there was no new evidence. It was after those two decisions that the person came to the Falun Dafa Association. At that point, the Falun Dafa Association communicated to the government that she was Falun Gong.
The problem here is timing in relation to what's going on. It may well be that if that information had been communicated to the board or the pre-removal risk assessment officer, this person wouldn't have been in that situation. But our position is that no matter when the information comes, it should be acted on or reacted to. It should never be too late, as long as the person is here.
Mechanically, of course, if the Falun Dafa Association gives subsequent information that a person is Falun Gong, there could be a new pre-removal risk assessment application, and the person should not be removed in the meantime until that new information is considered.
The trouble was that this person was removed, basically without consideration of this new information on the identification of the person as Falun Gong by the Falun Dafa Association, because the formal steps in the process had been completed.