I guess that question would probably be for my colleague. But if I may, Mr. Chair, I would just respond to the criminal element briefly.
I'd just like to say that when you look at how we remove people.... We have a priority list, as I mentioned, which starts off with the serious criminals and works its way down to failed refugee claimants and then others in an inadmissible class that would include illegal workers. So that's our priority system. When we look at the history of what happened last year, we look at a total of, as I mentioned, about 8% in the global inventory, if you like, of those people to be removed who have a criminal history.
Last year, of the 12,636 people removed, 15% were with criminal backgrounds. I think what that demonstrates is that certainly the priorities of removing criminals are being respected in our regional offices. They did remove a larger percentage than exists in the overall global inventory, and of course then they worked their way down to the others.
So I just wanted to provide you with those numbers, but I'll pass on the second part of your question.