Evidence of meeting #42 for Citizenship and Immigration in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was backlog.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Lorne Waldman  Immigration Lawyer, As an Individual
Barbara Jackman  Immigration and Refugee Lawyer, As an Individual
Janet Dench  Executive Director, Canadian Council for Refugees
Philip Mooney  National President, Canadian Association of Professional Immigration Consultants
Imran Qayyum  Vice-Chair, Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants
Warren Creates  Head, Immigration Law Group, Perley-Robertson, Hill and McDougall LLP
David Cohen  Immigration Lawyer, As an Individual
John P. Ryan  Chair, Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants
Tom Pang  Acting President, Chinese Canadian Community Alliance
Ping Tan  National Executive Co-Chair, National Congress of Chinese Canadians
Roberto Jovel  Coordinator, Policy and Research, Ontario Council of Agencies Serving Immigrants

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

He should have been finished here.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

Andrew Telegdi Liberal Kitchener—Waterloo, ON

--on Bill C-50 and this crazy process where we condense everything, we would have had him here for a couple of hours.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

Which the honourable member had a lot to do with in terms of it happening in this fashion.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

We're eating into Mr. Komarnicki's time here. Is it really necessary that we do that?

Okay.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

Ms. Jackman, I gather you're a--

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

On a point of order, Mr. Bevilacqua.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

Maurizio Bevilacqua Liberal Vaughan, ON

In fairness to Mr. Waldman, prior to beginning his presentation, he stated to you and to committee members that he would not be able to stay past--I thought it was 4:30--4:20 or something like that. He had a meeting at 4:30. That's what he said. So in fairness, if we had any concerns, we should have stated them to him directly while he was here.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

We should have regulated the time better than the seven minutes.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

I'm going to begin your time now, Mr. Komarnicki. You have seven minutes.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

Ms. Jackman, I gather you're a lawyer and have a legal background and have gone through Bill C-50 itself?

4:20 p.m.

Immigration and Refugee Lawyer, As an Individual

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

Would you confirm for me that Bill C-50 itself does not relate to refugees or protected persons, either in Canada or outside of Canada? Would you confirm that fact?

4:20 p.m.

Immigration and Refugee Lawyer, As an Individual

Barbara Jackman

No, it doesn't address them specifically, but they will make applications under those provisions that are in Bill C-50.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

But I heard today from a previous counsel that the relevant provisions of Bill C-50 that relate to prioritizing or categorizing do not apply to refugees and protected persons. Are you saying that Bill C-50 does apply to refugees and protected persons in any fashion?

4:20 p.m.

Immigration and Refugee Lawyer, As an Individual

Barbara Jackman

Of course it does.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

Okay, tell me how you say it does.

4:20 p.m.

Immigration and Refugee Lawyer, As an Individual

Barbara Jackman

If you're a refugee in Canada and wish to bring your spouse or your children to Canada, and they are not members of the family class because you didn't declare them when you came into the country, for example—but we're not going to remove you—you'd have to do a humanitarian and compassionate application. They're covered by it.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

But I'm talking specifically to the refugee himself or herself. I'm not talking about them making an application for a sponsorship of somebody outside of Canada. I'm talking about them—the refugee who is applying in Canada, or the refugee himself or herself applying out of Canada. Does this specific legislation apply to them...?

I would ask the honourable member to wait until it is his turn to question, if he wishes, because he's interrupting and interfering, and I'd prefer he didn't.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Order, please.

4:20 p.m.

Immigration and Refugee Lawyer, As an Individual

Barbara Jackman

There is nothing in this legislation, in the amendments, that would say that the minister couldn't put refugees to the bottom of the line in terms of prioritizing.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

And which provision of Bill C-50 says that?

4:20 p.m.

Immigration and Refugee Lawyer, As an Individual

Barbara Jackman

It's in proposed section 87.3, I think. I'd have to go back and look at the bill, actually. It specifically excludes sponsorship applications and temporary residence permits--

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

I'm not talking about sponsorships or temporary resident permits. I'm talking about the refugee application itself. I understood previous counsel to say that it didn't apply to refugees themselves.

4:20 p.m.

Immigration and Refugee Lawyer, As an Individual

Barbara Jackman

No, it doesn't, you're right, in the sense that it doesn't apply to establishing categories for refugees; it does with all related refugee stuff.

May 12th, 2008 / 4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

Okay. I'm talking about the refugees. So you'd agree with me on that now, would you?