So you're saying that what gets presented is one thing; what's in writing, black and whit, is something completely different. That is probably one of the reasons why the lawyer who was in front of us, Mr. Warren Creates, was initially supportive of it but later, after he read the fine print, said it was terrible and was against it.
Do you think it would be useful for the House of Commons--whether it be the immigration committee or the finance committee, because right now the matter is front of the finance committee--to conduct cross-country hearings so that people from different ethnic organizations, groups from coast to coast to coast, would actually have a chance to hear precisely what's being proposed and what impact it would have on the community? Would that be helpful?