All right.
Here's my second question. Some of you talked about the fact that, from now on, a permanent residency application made on compassionate grounds would no longer be systematically reviewed. It clearly states that it could, and not should, be studied, as is currently the case. That's a major concern for me because this recourse is often used by rejected refugees who can't appeal to the refugee appeal division because it isn't yet in place. Those people therefore have no further alternatives and then apply for permanent residency on compassionate grounds. That's often how they manage to remain in or enter the country, even though they have been refused.
Aren't you afraid, as I am, that this bill eliminates another option for these people and that it closes another door to people who have been victims of an injustice by a board member at the first level?