Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
I want Ms. Mason to know that I'm an immigrant to this country as well. My first job was sweeping sawdust in a factory as a young man, and I understand the struggles of immigration. I'm the product of Canada's immigration system and spend a great deal of time, as Ruby Dhalla does, protecting the rights of individuals who in fact need the help of legislators.
You said you represent the live-in caregivers and the whole issue of confidential services, rights, and responsibility. You have obviously focused on one particular case. I am wondering whether you're going to bring many more cases in front of this committee, supposing we as a committee, according to the questions raised by Mr. Dykstra and others, have taken up a role that is going to analyze all violations in relationship to the caregivers program.
I want you to know on behalf of the Liberal Party of Canada that we want to improve this program. If you take the time to read our report—as I'm sure you may have done, since you represent an agency that takes care of caregivers—then you will find that the Liberal Party has actually stood as a party that cares about caregivers for many, many years.
Why have you chosen only to represent these particular caregivers and not the many others who I'm sure have faced the same types of violations that they allege? Why is it just these two? Why has it become just an issue related to Ms. Ruby Dhalla? Why is there that focus?