I'll go back to a point that I tried to bring up as well. We believe that citizenship can be applied to an individual who can demonstrate significant ties to their country whether they be first, second, or third generation. Both my children were born in Japan. They're growing up in Canada, but if my daughter were to have a child while she was travelling in the United States and come back to Canada, that child would be second-generation Canadian.
Now, it is conceivable, albeit unlikely, that the child then, my grandchild, could be travelling somewhere else and have another child unexpectedly. That child would be a third-generation Canadian. If we're saying that this third-generation child cannot have Canadian citizenship, that's not taking into consideration any ties with Canada even if they may in fact grow up in Canada and be educated here. If they're going to school in France or Geneva and they have a child, can we say then that they are not Canadians because they're getting educated abroad?